How old would I be if I travelled 1000 light years in one year

  • If I were to travel 1000 light-years, and witness only 1 year elapse in my frame of reference, how much time would have passed in the frame of reference of the Earth?

  • pela

    pela Correct answer

    5 years ago

    The answer is sort of trivial. If you travel 1000 ly so fast that in your own reference frame it takes one year, then you will have aged by one year in your own reference frame. To do so, you will need a speed of almost the speed of light, so in the reference frame of Earth, you will have spent just a tad more that 1000 yr to travel 1000 ly.

    In general, the time dilation is given by the Lorentz factor $\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$ so to be exact, your speed must be
    1000^2 = \frac{1}{1 - v^2/c^2} ⇒ \\
    v = (1-10^{-6})^{1/2}\,c = 0.9999995c
    so your journey will take
    t = \frac{d}{v} = 1000.0005\,\mathrm{yr},
    i.e. 1000 years, 4 hours, and 23 minutes in Earth's reference frame.

    "Realistic" acceleration

    As David Hammen comments below, this assumes that your spaceship accelerates instantaneously to $v$. There are infinitely many ways to achieve that speed.
    The proper time $\tau$ (i.e. the time experienced by the traveler) to reach a distance $d$ when traveling at a constant acceleration $a$ is
    \tau = \frac{c}{a} \cosh^{-1} \left( \frac{ad}{c^2} +1 \right).
    Solving for $a$ yields the acceleration needed. The most pleasant way would arguably be accelarating at $a\simeq 19.2\,\mathrm{G}$ for half a year, and the decelerate at the same amount for the rest of the journey. A more pleasant way in the beginning, but less pleasant in the end, would be to accelerate at $a\simeq9.6\,\mathrm{G}$ for one year, and then crash into planet WASP-142b, which lies at a distance of roughly 1000 ly.

    Your journey, as measured by people on Earth, would then take
    t(\tau) = \frac{c}{a} \sinh \left( \frac{a \tau}{c} \right),
    which works out to roughly 18 and 36 days more, respectively, than in the instantaneous case. The reason that it doesn't differ that much is that you actually reach relativistic speeds pretty fast at this acceleration.

    The largest G-forces can be with endured in the "forward direction", i.e. corresponding to lying on your back and accelerating upwards (accelerating along the direction of your spine tends to break it, and accelerating "backward" makes your eyes pop out). According to Wikipedia, "acceleration pioneer" John Stapp withstood 25 G for 1.1 seconds, so you might want to send him instead of yourself.

    if you add "in earths reference frame" at the end of your answer, this is a very good answer.

    This assumes an instantaneous acceleration to 99.99995% of the speed of light. The answer is a bit different if the acceleration is constant to the halfway point, then slowing down from the halfway point to the destination. Note well: This will require a constant acceleration of 19 *g*.

    I totally understand it now. And yes it will be 1000 years in earth reference frame.

    I edited a bit to include the comments by @DavidHammen…

    …and @RononDex.

    Nicely done. I wouldn't deem being subject to over 19 *g* for a year as "pleasant".

    @DavidHammen: Me neither, but apparently you _can_ survive, at least for a few seconds…

    classically accelerating at 1g for 0.96yr will get you to 0.99c in 0.47 light years distance (easy math with 1g = 1.03 ly/yr2)

    Would he gain that one year back if he travelled with the same speed back again to where he came from? Or would that be two years in total?

    @Constantthin No sorry, no traveling back in time (not in this way, at least). If you travel 1000 lyr at v = 0.9999995 c, and ~instantly return at the same speed, you'll be roughly two years older when you get back. Meanwhile, 2000 yr has passed on Earth. This is the famous twin "paradox" (in quotes, because it's really not a paradox).

License under CC-BY-SA with attribution

Content dated before 7/24/2021 11:53 AM