What does the number of elements and groups in a lens mean?

  • All lens specifications include a statement of how many elements the lens contains, and in how many groups, for example:

    • Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300 mm 1:4,5-5,6G: 17 elements in 12 groups (two ED glass elements);
    • Nikon AF DX Fisheye-NIKKOR 10,5 mm 1:2,8G ED: 10 elements in 7 groups
    • Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 G ED II (kit): 7 elements in 5 groups
    • Nikon AF-S MICRO NIKKOR 60mm/2.8G ED: 12 elements in 9 groups
    • etc.

    What does this signify? How is this important for the lens? Does it make a difference in image quality? What is better: fewer or more elements/groups? Or does it not matter — in which case, why they are included in the specification?

    You should compare the same level of the lens (same or nearly same max. Aperture value) like 50mm f/1.0 against f/0.95, f/1.0 or f/1.1 in term of element and group, otherwise the comparison is meaningless.

  • Matt Grum

    Matt Grum Correct answer

    10 years ago

    I think manufacturers list the number of elements it just so you know how much effort they put into a lens!

    There's no simple answer to whether more of fewer elements is preferable. More elements generally means greater correction for distortion, chromatic aberration etc. however this extra correction might be necessary due to the design or the performance characteristics of the lens, not a sign of better image quality. Elements are often paired up, so the number of groups gives you a better idea of the number of corrections.

    However the more bits of glass the light travels through the more surfaces there are for reflections etc. so contrast and sharpness can be reduced. As an example, let's compare the Canon 50mm f/1.0L with the Canon 50mm f/1.8II

    First the f/1.0 version:

    11 elements in 9 groups

    Now the f/1.8 version

    6 elements in 5 groups

    Now stop both down to f/8 and the II would almost certainly be sharper. But which is better? You can't really say, because the first version has an ultra wide max aperture. It's a high performance lens which necessitates a lot of optical correction.

    Even comparing the degree of correction can be misleading. You'd think that a better corrected lens is preferable, but it can lead to other defects. Correcting for spherical aberration in particular often makes the bokeh worse (which is why some lenses leave it uncorrected). Lens design is all about compromise.

    So in summary, the number of elements/groups can be informative, but it's very rarely an absolute measure of quality or a reason to prefer a specific lens. The more important factors are the inclusion of special types of glass, such as low dispersion, (extra low dispersion) or flourite elements, and aspherical elements which perform better but are harder to make.

    Just out of curiosity, where do you get your wonderful lens construction diagrams? I love those.

    They're from the Canon camera museum, which is a fantastic site for Canon enthusiasts: http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/

License under CC-BY-SA with attribution


Content dated before 7/24/2021 11:53 AM