Is weed still legal for tourists in Amsterdam?

  • I have heard it's not legal starting from 2013. I also heard they postponed applying this?

    So what's the deal? Allowed or not?

    BTW. it **never was** legal. It's illegal, but not prosecuted.

    @vartec Well, that sounds legal enough ;)

    I just left Amsterdam 2 days ago and as of May 2013, weed is extremely "tolerated." Currently as a foreigner you can go into any coffee shop and buy up to 5g and a nice cup of tea to sit and enjoy. Amsterdam Questions Answered - Weed and Prostitution

    Really it's a little more than that. Illegal but not prosecuted is the way it is in Germany (per decision of the federal constitutional court) and many other countries (often with a great latitude left to individual police officers). In the Netherlands, there is indeed a statute forbidding cannabis in principle but there are also official instructions (*aanwijzing*) from the public prosecution service explicitly allowing the trade soft drugs under certain conditions and towns issue licenses for coffeeshops. That should count for something in understanding what is “legal”.

    While weed is tolerated under conditions it is NOT legal, whatever it looks like to foreigners. There is a big difference.

  • Correct answer

    8 years ago

    It has always been illegal and people have been arrested for smoking it in the open. I always love the faces of the tourists being arrested at Schiphol airport or in front of the Central station in Amsterdam for smoking weed. It is a global misconception that in Amsterdam it is as free as smoking cigarettes on the street. The principle has always been, what is called "Gedogen", which means that it is tolerated as long as you don't use it in the open and don't create annoyances. It is the Dutch way of dealing with social problems. It is similar to the so-called "afwerkplekken" for street prostitution. These are designated area's where street prostitution is tolerated. When ever there is a social problem that is hard to eradicate, the Dutch approach is encapsulate it in known zones, relieving other area's from problems related to that social problem.

    In the seventies the Dutch government introduced so called "coffeeshops", which are designated establishments where cannabis use is tolerated. Again recognize the difference between tolerated and allowed.

    What has changed recently is the legal status for these coffeeshops. They are now only allowed as a member-only organization for local residents. To get access to a coffeeshop you need to register as a member providing proof you live in the same city. The change of this regulation was guided by the pressure from Belgium and Germany. Border cities like Maastricht, Roosendaal, Terneuzen were like magnets to weed smokers from France, Belgium and Germany, causing problems in those cities and the surrounding countries. This was the reason behind introducing the member-only requirement for coffeeshops. This is also why the weed-pass as it is informally called was first introduced in the border regions and later imposed on other cities like Amsterdam. As Mark already said, again some cities like Amsterdam chose not to spent resources on enforcing this. Border cities did introduce the legislation to require the member-only status of coffeeshops, with the effect that most coffeeshops did close.

    In the American idiom, "Don't ask, don't tell." But it seems like if you "tell," you will be arrested.

    Is this still a valid answer as of now (2015)?

    The situation did not change (much) in 2013 nor since. Now municipalities can decide whether they allow everybody to buy weed or just those locals with a membership to the shop. It is mostly near the border with Belgium that the coffeeshops require memberships.

License under CC-BY-SA with attribution

Content dated before 7/24/2021 11:53 AM